I've had Cloud Atlas on my shelf for some time now, and have wanted to read it for ages. I'm one of those people who, when I have a book on my shelf that comes out in movie form, I stubbornly refuse to see the movie until I've read the book. (It's why I have yet to see Oscar and Lucinda, despite loving Ralph Fiennes. HOW old is that movie now?? Book still sitting here, unread.)
So when Cloud Atlas came out to generally mixed reviews, I thought maybe for a change I won't bemoan the fact I didn't read the book first, and instead I will simply read the book. Just after Christmas I picked it up and read it through our trip to Florida in January.
And it is honestly unlike any book I've ever read.
The book contains six separate storylines that at first don't appear to have anything to do with one another. The first story ends mid-sentence, which caused me at first to think I had a faulty book missing a signature (I went back and forth checking the page numbers before realizing it was intentional... not surprising, given I was one of those people who thought my cable had cut out at the very end of The Sopranos series finale). After the second story ends mid-thought, I began realizing there was something else going on. And then motifs began popping up from one story to the next.
Moving from an ill man's diary entries on a 19th century ship through to a society in the very, very distant future — and then backwards back to the ship — the book spans centuries, and in doing so has a very important message. Nothing that will hit you over the head (in fact, I'm quite certain a number of readers have probably finished this book and thought, Well, what the hell was THAT?!) but if you can see the ties that connect one story to the next, you'll really begin to enjoy it. (The first concrete one happens between the second and third.)
I have SO MUCH to say about this book, but can't because I don't want to spoil it for you. If you are a Lost fan (and if you're reading this blog, there's a very high likelihood you are), I think you'll like this book. It's challenging, philosophical, laugh-out-loud funny at times, and so beautifully written that David Mitchell will make you feel inferior no matter how good a writer you think you are. He plays with so many styles in this — journalling, epistolary, PG Wodehouse–type British comedy, noir detective story, and science fiction — and writes each one like that's his only style. I can't say enough good things about this book. So I'll just tell you to trust me on this and give it a shot.
And in the meantime, maybe I'll finally bring myself to see the movie. While reading the book, I kept thinking, "How could anyone have possibly adapted this to film?" While I've heard it's disappointing, I'm interested and intrigued to see the attempt.
OK, what's the second book you've read this year?
Sunday, February 17, 2013
Friday, February 15, 2013
The Walking Dead: "The Suicide King"
Welcome back to the second half of the third season of
analysis of The Walking Dead, with my
wonderful and brilliant co-host, Joshua. (In a zombie apocalypse, I would
totally eat your brains first, bud.)
We last left our survivors on the brink, with “Merle ’n’
Derle” in a battle to the death with the Governor acting as the one-eyed
referee. He recently lost his ability to enjoy 3D films when Michonne impaled
his sinister eyeball, after doing away with his tiny little zombie daughter.
So, she’s in the bad books with him, to say the least.
Tyrese and his trio of survivors had gotten into the prison
after losing the mother and wife of the other two, but Carl — who did an
immense amount of growing up in the first half of the season, officially
sloughing off the mantle of “character we kinda want dead” — is acting as
deputy sheriff (he even has the hat,
people!) and has locked them away until he can figure out what to do with them.
Rick and his gang had invaded Woodbury, but apparently had
shown up with 47 canisters of teargas and used every one of them, so Andrea
just started shooting into the smoke, not knowing she was aiming at her own
people. Oscar from the prison was killed (because Tyrese was introduced and
there’s only room for one African-American on the show at one time), and the
others managed to get away. Maggie had been stripped of the top half of her
clothing by the Governor, who brought her in to Glenn like that, and Glenn
thought Maggie was raped and spilled the location of the prison where the
others were. The Governor had only scared her, though, threatening to hurt her but not doing it.
And so, at the beginning of this episode, we end up back in
the ring with the two hillbilly brothers. Poor Daryl has been haunted by what
he thought was the ghost of his dead brother for a long time, and is now
face-to-face with a grotesque mangled version of him, and he’s upset and
confused about what to do. Merle jumps right into the fray and begins pounding
on his brother, taking out some of his anger for having been left behind so
many months ago. But it doesn’t last, and soon the brothers stand together and
begin to take out the real enemy — the menacing walkers around them.
They
escape, join up with Rick’s group, and Merle continues to be an utter ass while
Daryl just looks too baffled to speak. When Rick knocks Merle unconscious with
the butt of his gun, Daryl doesn’t fight him. He’s speechless and confused.
Confused because this is his blood, his big brother who probably stuck up for
him for a lot of his life. However, he also knows his brother’s a complete
dick, and he’s conflicted about what to do. On his own, Daryl has flourished
and has been allowed to turn into a real, sympathetic human being who is part
of the group. Now he’s faced with a very difficult decision — does he go back
to his brother and live separately in Merle’s “us against them” mentality, or
does he return to the prison, with a group of people who have become his
family? Who accept him as one of them? Who respect him? Who, in Carol’s case,
truly care about him?
And in this case, blood is thicker than water. Daryl issues
the “No him, no me” ultimatum, and then follows through on it when Rick refuses
to integrate Merle back into the group (honestly, while Rick hasn’t made the
wisest decisions lately, this is one where you can hardly blame him).
What did you think about Daryl’s decision, Josh, and the
return of the show in general?
Joshua: Well,
howdy, Nik-at-Nitehawks! Happy Gnaw Year, and welcome back to Georgia. I’ve
missed you like a hastily amputated limb, and I am so pleased that the Mayan
apocalypse didn’t annihilate us all before we can find out how Li’l Asskicker
turns out.
Most of the action from this week’s return came right at the
top of the hour, as Rick and Maggie rode in to rescue the Brothers Dixon from
the Woodbury lynch mob just in time. But of course, the decision to bring Merle
along went over like a fart in church, as my great grandmother would say. And
truly, Rick could have expected nothing else – particularly from Glenn, who
still bears the marks of Merle’s interrogation, both physical and emotional. I
wouldn’t have thought Glenn would come out of their experience more affected
than Maggie, but that certainly seems to be the case. Between the brutalities
of his treatment, the sustained endangerment of their lives, and his own
essential helplessness, Glenn has been pushed to the breaking point since their
abduction. Personally, I would give myself a lot more credit if I had managed
to kill a walker while tied to a chair and then armed (excuse the pun) my
girlfriend with an improvised dagger made out of the guy’s freakin’ ulna. But
maybe that’s just me.
Regardless, Glenn has been through the ringer,
unquestionably assuming more than once that his death was a foregone conclusion
and likely assuming the same for the woman he loves. And yet, somehow, they
made it out alive. After all this peril and strain, he’s never been so
instable, so vulnerable, and the sight of his friends returning from their
rescue mission with his captor in tow almost finished him. We’ve spent a lot of
time this season discussing how successful the writing team has been in
conveying the emotional fragility of the characters, the fallout from such
constant fatigue and the way that feeds into all other aspects of their lives.
Everything about Glenn’s desperation and anxiety felt genuine to me, made all
the more heartbreaking by the way it served to push our ever-shrinking band of
survivors even farther apart.
Case in point: as we all feared, Daryl has chosen blood over
community, electing to strike out on his own with Merle rather than abandon his
brother for the esteem and purpose he’s found amongst the group. It wasn’t hard
to imagine that things would go down like this, but what surprised me was how
obviously he wore his heartache. Daryl has always been a closed door as a
character, withholding any outward displays of emotion that weren’t aggressive
or confrontational, but slowly that has changed. I don’t believe we’ve ever
seen him be quite so transparent as he was in his anguish over being forced
into this decision, and I suspect Daryl’s grief will manifest itself in some
striking displays of anger and resentment toward his brother in the coming
weeks. Eventually he’s bound to make his way back, whatever the reason (as a
die-hard softie, I’m hoping it’s Carol, but dollars to doughnuts it will prove
some random manifestation of Merle’s innate depravity instead). Meanwhile, the
others are left to suffer the fallout of his departure.
Which brings me to my pick for episode MVP. Melissa McBride
has always done a tremendous job with the delicate balancing act of playing
Carol, but since Lori’s death, it seems she’s been slotted into the position of
TWD Matriarch. This week’s episode in particular gave her a number of times to
shine, and she nailed it in every instance. From her noise pollution soliloquy
with Carl at the gate through her gut-wrenching reaction to – and eventual
acceptance of – Daryl’s decision to leave, Carol played the heart of the team
every bit as effectively as Hershel played the backbone. I love where the
writers are leading her, and Ms. McBride is selling it brilliantly.
Nikki: I so agree with you on Carol. She’s a
wonderful character on the show, and was, as you say, a little one-dimensional
in the first season (and in most of the second) but in the third, she’s really
come forward. I think some part of me will always be haunted by that scene of
her last fall where she sat over the dead zombie with a scalpel, trying to
figure out how to do a c-section. And the way she played the scene where Daryl
doesn’t return isn’t the way you’d expect it to be played: either playing it
cool, pretending it’s no big deal and then crying on her own, or else going
over-the-top with her emotions. Instead, she’s more confused, “Really? He’s gone? HE’S GONE?” as if she’s trying to
figure out how this is possible.
And I agree with you. Daryl will find his way back, but how and why he does will be what I can’t wait to watch.
What I found interesting between Maggie and Glenn is that he
thinks she’s been raped, and she knows that she was threatened, but not
actually raped. And yet… she hasn’t told Glenn this. Is it because he thinks
she’s been raped, and she was too much in shock to tell him the truth, and now
it feels like she can’t tell him? Or…
has she not told him because she thinks that he went too far in giving the
Governor the location of Rick and company, and he only did so because he
thought they’d done something terrible to Maggie? And now, if she tells him she
wasn’t actually raped, he’ll think that she had misled him by not saying
something instantly, not confirming, “I’m OK! They didn’t hurt me, DON’T SAY
ANYTHING” as soon as she appeared in the doorway with the Governor? It’s a
really tough situation that’s only being conveyed through her eyes and body
language right now, but it’s hard to pinpoint what’s going through their minds
right now.
I hate seeing Glenn broken.
And now over to Rick. Like Jack Shephard on Lost, Rick is making some decisions that
not all fans are going to like, but as a leader, that’s what you do. Unlike
Jack, however, Rick took the mantle of leader; Jack had the role thrust upon
him. Rick is starting to act less like a leader and more like a dictator. “I
give you food and water and save your life, and in return you will listen to
me!” I understand this guy has been through the ringer — remember, Lori’s only
been dead a few days at this point, though it seems like months to us — and
he’s clearly mentally ill. Between Shane and Lori, the ghosts of his past are
catching up to him, and affecting his ability to judge what’s real and what
isn’t.
I was actually starting to hate him in the scene when he was
telling Tyrese to move along, he wasn’t welcome here. I understand the whole
“not trusting” thing, but at some point the only way to rebuild your life is to
begin trusting other people. And Tyrese seems like a really good person. You
can’t just mistrust everyone (for some reason he can trust Lyle but not
Tyrese? How is that now?)
But the writers are able to pull us back from the brink of
hating Rick by showing just how mentally unstable he is, when Lori appears on
the upper tier. You could see by the looks on everyone else’s face that they
are equal parts baffled and scared (especially poor Carl, who’s lost one parent
and now must fear he’s losing another), and poor Tyrese and his crew
immediately assume that when he’s yelling to get out, he’s yelling and waving
the gun at them (just facing the other direction for some reason). And, Tyrese
not being stupid, they quickly grab their stuff and beat it.
Again, I haven’t yet read the graphic novels (though they’re
sitting right behind me as I type this and I’m starting to move my chair closer
to them), but I heard a lot about Tyrese before he finally showed up on the
series, so I’m assuming that’s not the last we see of him. I’m hoping he’s
integrated into the group and becomes a rival for leader. Now THAT would make
for some pretty intense television.
Joshua: Depending
on the angle they take, there is definitely some interesting stuff coming up
with Tyrese. It's impossible to predict what we'll see and what we won't,
however, as events have already differed so much between the two versions. For
example, Tyrese appears in the comics not long after the group leaves Atlanta,
even before they find Hershel's farm, and he has a daughter and her boyfriend
in tow but no other adults. He certainly comes across as similar in
disposition, but as I said, all bets are off at this point.
As the show progresses, it seems (at least to me) that the
source material becomes increasingly less pertinent. It's sort of a butterfly
effect: in the early days, any divergence from the comic canon was significant
simply by virtue of being different, as the makeup of the group and the
circumstances in which they found themselves were still largely the same. Then
Shane survived the Atlanta camp, and they decided to visit the CDC, and the
divergences gradually snowballed until now the story has come to resemble less
what first appeared in the comics and much more its own beast with a somewhat
similar shape. That being the case, there's really no way to tell any more what
will migrate over and what will fall by the wayside.
Whichever direction they choose at this latest intersection,
I think Tyrese is meant to be a big part of it. It's already obvious that the
writers are working hard to make him not just likeable but admirable; even in
his limited screen time thus far, Tyrese has proven to be calm, perceptive,
even-tempered and infinitely reasonable, not to mention perfectly capable in
combat situations. And it would certainly appear that Rick would do well to
start sharing some of the burden of responsibility, as the stress of leadership
continues to push him closer to the breaking point.
Then there's Woodbury, where their leader has already
sprinted well past the breaking point and is somewhere out in the no man's land
beyond, building a campfire and sharpening sticks for a weenie roast. I loved
the various symptoms of his madness this week, from the half-smile that
appeared on his face in the arena when he realized they were being attacked
again, to the scene in the street after the zombie attack and the brilliant way
he trudged out like a sulky teen to shoot the guy in the head, everyone else
just standing speechless and staring. And the saddest part is that the citizens
are so clueless, they'll still follow him. They've either completely forgotten
what things are like outside Woodbury's walls or have been holed up there since
the beginning and simply don't realize the way the world has changed, as
evidenced by how anxious they are to leave after the attack, their cars all
piled with luggage like they're going on vacation. It would almost be funny if it
weren't so tragic.
Fortunately, there are still a couple of marginally sane
people around, however deluded they may be. I continue to struggle with
Andrea's place in all this, as she persists in coming across more like a plot
device than a reasonable human being. It's difficult for me to understand why
she would feel more beholden to these people – none of whom she knows from more
than a handful of exchanged pleasantries – than to the group with which she
traveled for so long. But then again, she was also making plans to strike out
on her own when they were camped at Hershel's farm, too. I'm sure there's an
end point, but I'll be damned if I can see it.
What are your thoughts on Miss The Governor and her place in
the inevitable conflict to come?
Nikki: Oh Andrea. You’ve kinda replaced Carl as our
go-to Annoying Person. So, to briefly recap Andrea, about 30 minutes before
this episode began, she’d walked into the Governor’s room and saw:
-her (now former) best friend sticking a sword through the
Guv’s eye
-a dead mini-walker on the floor
-zombie heads floating in some sort of fluid, being kept
alive
Let’s just pause and read that last one again. Got it? Good.
And she
-holds a gun to Michonne’s head and helps out her new
boyfriend while Michonne, hurt and angry, leaves
Not exactly the decision-maker of the year.
Then she watches the Guv’nah pit two brothers together in a
ring, quickly unravel in front of the audience, and turn into a soulless animal
who differs from the walkers only by smell (and a tad less rottage).
Does she turn tail and run? Nope. She tries to talk some
sense into him. She stays at Woodbury. She becomes a pseudo leader of the
people (you can already see the Guv doesn’t like that). And she seems to be in
it for the long haul. As you say, she
has no connections to these people, but maybe that’s just Andrea. She just followed
the other survivors but didn’t get close to them, and I doubt she shed any
tears when she lost track of them. She turned her back on Michonne without a
second glance. So why she’s sticking by this sicko come hell or high water is
beyond me. But the others were easy: he’s difficult. And maybe that’s what
attracts her. She’s going to change
him. Because every time a woman has decided to do THAT throughout history, it’s
gone very well indeed.
This was clearly a transition episode. My husband watched it
after I did, and he was kind of “meh” about it, but that’s what it’s supposed
to be. Episode 8 ended in a cliffhanger, and episode 9 is meant to be the spark
for the rest of the season. What will happen to Merle ’n’ Derle? What will
happen to Tyrese and his people? What will happen to Woodbury, to the
Governor, to Andrea? Will Rick EVER stop being a jerk to Michonne? Will
Michonne ever feel an innate need to play along with others and, you know, TALK
so Rick won’t get so frustrated with her? (By the way, the only scene in this
episode I didn’t buy was Hershel poking Michonne and saying she’d gone into a
very deep sleep. That woman never
goes into a deep sleep, and has probably had no more than two consecutive hours
of sleep in the past 18 months. There’s no way she wouldn’t have leapt off that
bed and taken his other leg off just for touching her.)
This episode asked the questions, and now we get the rest of
the episodes of the season to find the answers.
Josh, any last thoughts?
Joshua: Though I
mentioned it earlier in an offhand comment, I'd be remiss if I didn't
specifically address Hershel's role this week as resident guidance counselor
and all-around voice of reason. Our favorite horse doctor continues to handle
each and every situation with a delicate touch and preternatural insight, and I
loved all of his exchanges this week. In particular, his words to Rick were
always perfectly pitched, equal parts praising and prodding, and I can't
reiterate often enough how glad I am that he's still alive. If anyone has the
capacity to lead Rick back from the edge of madness, it's Mr. Greene.
Bits & Bobs:
-
Perhaps it was just poor framing, but the unruly
mob of Woodburians screaming for double Dixon death in the opener seemed a lot
smaller and less threatening to me this week than back at the end of the
episode previous. Norman Reedus' panicked performance went a long way toward
selling it, but the next time a scene calls for 'murderous,' the extras could
definitely step it up a bit. (Also, casting director, I only live a very short
drive away from the set. And excel at acting murderous. FYI.)
-
Dead
right about the unlikelihood of Michonne sleeping through Hershel's crutch
poke. My notes during that scene read, “Whoops – there goes his other leg.” And
besides, haven't we been led to believe that Michonne processes her body's need
for rest through her vocal cords, manifesting itself in temporary paralysis any
time she's asked a pertinent question? I mean, duh.
-
I brought
it up in a comment on your Facebook post yesterday, Nikki, but Carol's maroon
pants tucked into those black ankle boots make her a dead ringer for a 1st-gen
Starship Enterprise crewmember. Cross your fingers she never winds up in a red
shirt.
That's all I've got, gang. See you all next week. (We're
shooting for at least Thursday...)
Sunday, February 03, 2013
Tuesday, January 29, 2013
Book #1: Marbles by Ellen Forney
As I said in yesterday's post, I'm going to keep track here of the books that I read in 2013, and see if I can make it to 25. (For all I know, I've already been making it to that number, but I just don't keep track!)
I said in that post that I would count graphic novels as proper books, and lo and behold, I'm starting the year with one. Marbles by Ellen Forney is an extraordinary look at bipolar disorder (also called manic depression), told by someone who has it. This is a memoir that moves from Forney's diagnosis in the mid-90s, and takes you through the following 15 years of her life, the ups and downs, the confusion and regret, and the constant battle with medications.
At first she delights in her manic episodes, thinking it helps her reach new creative peaks. Like a constant bolt of adrenalin, her manic behaviour pushes her to do more and more, and be wilder and wilder with her goals. Throughout it all she has a wonderful psychiatrist working with her, urging her to take medication. But she has one deep fear: as an artist, wouldn't taking medication stifle her creativity? I mean, if Michelangelo and Van Gogh and hundreds of artists throughout history are now widely assumed to have been bipolar — and were unmedicated — shouldn't she join their ranks? Shouldn't she embrace the manic side of her life and learn to live with it, unmedicated?
Her psychiatrist gently explains to her that yes, those people were unmedicated, and most of them committed suicide, too.
Unfortunately, when you're up, there's only one direction to go next, and when she hits bottom, she hits rock bottom. Over several pages you can feel the darkness descend over her life. Frame after frame of the book shows her as nothing but a ball, curled up under a blanket on the couch, unable to move or do anything. Her paranoia begins building, and eventually she gives in and tries the meds. We watch her swing from one extreme to the other as her body adjusts, rejects, adjusts, and rejects one med after another, until finally, after a decade, she finds the perfect combo. AND finds a place where she can be as creative as she wants to be, and doesn't feel like her mind is a fog.
This book is amazing. If you are lucky enough not to suffer from bipolar disorder, you probably know someone who does, and this is an excellent book not just for readers in general, who will delight in her story and gorgeous illustrations, but for anyone who is worried about a loved one, or, most importantly, those suffering from the disease. There is hope, and Forney's is the only book I've ever read on bipolar disorder that unequivocally lays that out for readers. Highly recommended.
OK, your turn. In the comments below, tell me about the first book you read this year!
I said in that post that I would count graphic novels as proper books, and lo and behold, I'm starting the year with one. Marbles by Ellen Forney is an extraordinary look at bipolar disorder (also called manic depression), told by someone who has it. This is a memoir that moves from Forney's diagnosis in the mid-90s, and takes you through the following 15 years of her life, the ups and downs, the confusion and regret, and the constant battle with medications.
At first she delights in her manic episodes, thinking it helps her reach new creative peaks. Like a constant bolt of adrenalin, her manic behaviour pushes her to do more and more, and be wilder and wilder with her goals. Throughout it all she has a wonderful psychiatrist working with her, urging her to take medication. But she has one deep fear: as an artist, wouldn't taking medication stifle her creativity? I mean, if Michelangelo and Van Gogh and hundreds of artists throughout history are now widely assumed to have been bipolar — and were unmedicated — shouldn't she join their ranks? Shouldn't she embrace the manic side of her life and learn to live with it, unmedicated?
Her psychiatrist gently explains to her that yes, those people were unmedicated, and most of them committed suicide, too.
Unfortunately, when you're up, there's only one direction to go next, and when she hits bottom, she hits rock bottom. Over several pages you can feel the darkness descend over her life. Frame after frame of the book shows her as nothing but a ball, curled up under a blanket on the couch, unable to move or do anything. Her paranoia begins building, and eventually she gives in and tries the meds. We watch her swing from one extreme to the other as her body adjusts, rejects, adjusts, and rejects one med after another, until finally, after a decade, she finds the perfect combo. AND finds a place where she can be as creative as she wants to be, and doesn't feel like her mind is a fog.
This book is amazing. If you are lucky enough not to suffer from bipolar disorder, you probably know someone who does, and this is an excellent book not just for readers in general, who will delight in her story and gorgeous illustrations, but for anyone who is worried about a loved one, or, most importantly, those suffering from the disease. There is hope, and Forney's is the only book I've ever read on bipolar disorder that unequivocally lays that out for readers. Highly recommended.
OK, your turn. In the comments below, tell me about the first book you read this year!
Monday, January 28, 2013
25 Books in 2013
So. Every year a friend of mine begins a new group on Facebook encouraging people to read 25 books in [whatever year this happens to be]. And every year I enthusiastically begin by including my first four or five books that I've read. And then I wonder, what about manuscripts I'm working on but won't be published until next year? Can't mention them yet, because obviously that doesn't help people look them up if they're interested. So I don't post them. And then I forget to post them when the books are out.
At some point around March or so, I forget to add in a few, and then I can't remember what book #6 or #7 was, and I just give up. I try to add a few of them to Goodreads, where I keep a dusty and not-very-well-used account, and then... well, you know. In the meantime I watch friends piling up the books they're reading, and watch the 25 Books in [whatever year this happens to be] building and building as people reach the lofty #25 goal and then move on to #26, #27, and beyond. (I shake my fist at those crazy kids, remembering a time long ago when I was able to read so much!)
When we moved in August, I put books on my bookshelves that I'd put on my bookshelves in the last move, and some in the move previous to that 12 years ago... and they hadn't been read then and they haven't been read now. What. The hell. I sit surrounded by these shelves every day (they're surrounding me right now), and think if I could do anything, it would be sitting down to read those books. NOT watching TV, not going to the movies, not going outside to do anything, just finding a day with an empty house and sitting and reading.
But then I remember I really need to clean that living room. And the kitchen. And I did the laundry, but it's still sitting in the dryer. And I'm never alone in the house. And I can set the Saturday morning alarm for 6:30 to try to curl up on the couch and read, but my daughter is up at 6 on Saturdays to hit the Family channel before anyone else is up (Monday to Friday, you're pushing her out of bed at 7:30, but come weekends...). And, well, I REALLY need to clear off some of the stuff on the PVR. And I've watched some of that season of that show, but not all of it, and I need to return the DVDs to the library. And while I already watched that other show, a bunch of people have asked me to blog on it. And I haven't blogged in a while, so I really should. And I've been editing all day and my eyes are kind of sore and tired. Or I didn't edit enough today and so I should work for a couple of hours before going to bed (the joys of working at home). And while I took grad school English lit, and I'm a writer, and an editor, for god's sakes, I am such a slow reader. No, really. Molasses slow. I've always loved words — the look of them on the page, the details — and since I was a teenager I've read very slowly and carefully, committing every detail to memory. So, it takes me a while.
Oh, and did I mention the kids walking into the room every three seconds? See, a mom sitting on the couch with a book signals a mom who isn't doing anything. Dad can disappear, but not Mom.
The other night a friend of mine was over, someone I hadn't seen in close to 20 years (yowza) and when my husband and I started bombarding him with TV shows he should be watching, he said, "You know, I'm really trying to read more." And I said, sarcastically, "Read?! Pfft. Who does that anymore??" Of course, it's what I've been trying to do more of for years.
But this year, I'm going to make a serious effort. In fact, I already have. I just finished Books #4 AND #5 today (yes, I tend to read more than one at the same time; always have...) And then I'm going to post here when I finish. It might be super short, it might be very long. But I'll say something. And maybe some of you can join in. When I post my #1 (tomorrow, since I have five books to catch you up on!), you can post your #1s in the comments. Then you can post your #2 book of the year under mine. Don't worry... it's doubtful I'll get ahead of you. Far more likely that you'll be stockpiling books waiting for me to get the hell to #10 since you're almost at #17. We can switch off books — give me some of your best suggestions, and I can promise my reading is eclectic (a friend of mine started suggesting books for my best friend instead of for me because, as she put it, "I can't quite figure out your taste anymore!").
I include graphic novels as legit reading materials, by the way. I know some people say you can breeze through them in one sitting and therefore they shouldn't count, but that's not how I read graphic novels. I tend to get so caught up in the details of the pictures that I can sit and stare at the visuals on the pages longer than I would have if the pages had been filled with text. And graphic novels have contained some of the most heart-wrenching and funny stories I've ever read. (See Y: The Last Man, for starters.) SO... they count.
I'm sure to many of you, 25 is nothing. So I'm aiming for higher. But for now, I'm going to say 25 because that's about one every two weeks, and, well, life is crazy and wonderful, and I'm not going to add one more stress to it. Since moving to London, Ontario, I've joined three book clubs, so if nothing else motivates me, that certainly will. But you guys have always been amazing motivators, too.
And by the way, I have been watching 1970s Doctor Who, have seen a ton of films, and just finished season 2 of Sons of Anarchy, and have watched THE MOST AMAZING documentary I've ever seen and I MUST tell you about all of it!!! But... let's hit the books first. I'll get around to that other stuff eventually. Maybe even talk about the end of Fringe just around the time everyone's forgotten what it was about.
So who's with me?
Saturday, January 19, 2013
Fringe Finale
From "White Tulip," season 2, episode 18:
WALTER: I, too, attempted the unimaginable, and I succeeded. I crossed into another universe, and took a son that wasn't mine. And since then, not a day has passed without me feeling the burden of that act. I'm going to tell you something that I have never told another soul. Until I took my son from the other side, I had never believed in God. But it occurred to me... that my actions had betrayed him and that everything that had happened to me since was God punishing me. So now I'm looking for a sign of forgiveness. I've asked God for a sign of forgiveness. A specific one, a white tulip.
ALISTAIR PECK: Tulips don't bloom this time of year -- white or otherwise.
WALTER: But he's God. And if God can forgive me for my acts then maybe... it's in the realm of possibility that my son, possibly, may be able to forgive me too.
Friday, January 18, 2013
Fringe: A Love Story
Tonight Fringe comes to an end. For five seasons, this show has entertained its tiny, loyal audience, and somehow achieved the impossible: surviving on FOX without being cancelled. Clearly someone high up loves this show as much as we do.
Why do so few people watch it? I think they're afraid of the fact it's a "sci-fi show." And why do the rest of us love it as much as we do? Well, because it's so much more than a sci-fi show (as almost all sci-fi shows are).
Fringe, as I've said here many times, is a story about love. It's a show, like Lost and so many other shows of the 21st century, about the connections we have with others. But while Lost was content to show us that everyone is connected, Fringe explores what those connections mean and more importantly, what we are willing to do for those we love.
Season 1 began with a typical fringe-science-freakshow-of-the-week premise, where they found a problem, dealt with it, and moved on. But even then there was a sense that it was moving to something bigger. Like many people, I watched the first episode or two and then gave up. Too much science, not enough emotion. Boy, was I wrong. Thank goodness I came back.
Now, five years later, it's clear what Fringe is. It's a show about love: parental, romantic, filial, platonic. It's a show where a father loves his son so much he creates a catastrophic bridge between two universes to find him. Where he hates himself so much for what he's done that he literally has a piece of himself removed. It's a show where a race of superhumans can travel through time like the aliens in Slaughterhouse-Five to observe how their ancestors acted. Where one of these superhumans defies his own unemotional nature to become attached to the Bishop family, saving Peter's life as his father crosses him from one universe to the next, thereby driving a hole through time that would destroy one universe while another one slowly disintegrated.
It's a show where that son would grow up and love a woman so deeply that he would cross over through the ether to show her he loved her, where he could tell the difference between her and her alt-universe copy and love only one. It's a show where these two people would find each other in a world beyond our world, beyond death, beyond any understanding, and come together once again. Where they would create a daughter who would bring them together and then explode them apart when she is taken during the Earth's invasion of the Observers (circa 2015), and where they would freeze themselves in time just to find her 20 years later, and help her overthrow the superhumans. Where their love is not only just for each other anymore: it's for all of humanity.
And I have this terrible feeling that they're not all going to make it. There is nothing in the world that Walter Bishop loves more than his son, Peter. And nothing Peter loves more than his wife, Olivia. And nothing she loves more than her daugher, Etta. They've already lost one, leaving Olivia a shred of her former self. And if they can follow the path that will lead them to the salvation of all humanity — moving to a point in time where they can make it so the Observers never existed — then does that mean that the history of humanity will play itself out without the interference of the Observers? Will Walter still create a bridge to steal a son... but lose him in the ice?
Fringe began as a show about a group of scientists and agents who were intent on helping save the world from nasty things. And they grew into a group of people who were intent on finding each other and saving their relationships. Now, they must try to save the world without losing each other in the process.
If you have not watched Fringe, I urge you to go to season 1, make it through those first episodes (don't worry, they will add up to something by the end of the season), and watch the most exquisite love story unfold before your eyes. There is nothing these people won't do to save each other. And that's what makes their fate so terrifying... and yet so beautiful.
Tuesday, January 15, 2013
Doctor... Who?
I told a story on my Facebook page at the beginning of December that I'd had a phone call with my mother, who subscribes to magazines full of British merchandise. She wanted to know if my brother would like a cookie jar with The Who on it.
"The Who? As in, the band?" I asked.
"I think so? It's a blue... police box, it says."
"Wait, Doctor Who?"
"Oh yes, that's it."
"No, he wouldn't be interested, but I would!"
Well, did this ever make HER happy. She had a whole magazine full of stuff related to this show, and as usual, was ready to buy me every single item in there. (My husband spent the next few weeks talking her out of most of it.) I told her in the same phone call that actually, I didn't want a cookie jar, but the salt and pepper shakers. She flipped through the magazine and said, "Oh, the... turdis and... day-lick?" "YES, the turdis and daylick!" I said.
So on Christmas Day, here's what I got from her:
Very exciting! I got my salt and pepper shakers, which made me very happy (especially the packaging; check out what's on the box):
The Epic Struggle for the Balance of Taste! (HA!)
And there was a teapot, too!
I checked, and it was difficult to say if it's bigger on the inside:
I'll have to make some tea to find out.
The calendar has the first 11 Doctors in order, which is very cool because I'm watching Classic episodes now and am on the Fourth Doctor, so I hope I can keep ahead of the month where the new Doctor appears (Hartnell is on my wall now). All of them appear in December.
But let's just say, I have a new reason to look forward to October:
Next year, maybe I'll get a sonic screwdriver!
"The Who? As in, the band?" I asked.
"I think so? It's a blue... police box, it says."
"Wait, Doctor Who?"
"Oh yes, that's it."
"No, he wouldn't be interested, but I would!"
Well, did this ever make HER happy. She had a whole magazine full of stuff related to this show, and as usual, was ready to buy me every single item in there. (My husband spent the next few weeks talking her out of most of it.) I told her in the same phone call that actually, I didn't want a cookie jar, but the salt and pepper shakers. She flipped through the magazine and said, "Oh, the... turdis and... day-lick?" "YES, the turdis and daylick!" I said.
So on Christmas Day, here's what I got from her:
| Mom's comment on the shirt: "I have no idea what that means, but I was told if you watch Doctor Who, you'll get it." |
The Epic Struggle for the Balance of Taste! (HA!)
And there was a teapot, too!
I checked, and it was difficult to say if it's bigger on the inside:
I'll have to make some tea to find out.
The calendar has the first 11 Doctors in order, which is very cool because I'm watching Classic episodes now and am on the Fourth Doctor, so I hope I can keep ahead of the month where the new Doctor appears (Hartnell is on my wall now). All of them appear in December.
But let's just say, I have a new reason to look forward to October:
Next year, maybe I'll get a sonic screwdriver!
Thursday, January 03, 2013
The Unhappiest Man on Earth
As I mentioned in my post yesterday, I'm in Florida with my family and today we hit the Magic Kingdom! The happiest place on Earth! The place where dreams come true! Where everyone is a kid again!!
That is... everyone but Sir Grumpy McCrank. Also known as, MY HUSBAND.
Ah yes, see, everyone's been saying for weeks now, "Have fun! You'll have a great time!" And I smile and say, "Oh yes... I'm sure we, um, will..." but they don't realize that I tend to go to theme parks with my brother, or friends, or anyone but my husband because he hates this sort of thing. My daughter is 8, and he has never taken her to see fireworks, because he hates the crowds and the noise and fireworks are stupid and do you know how long it will take to get out of the parking lot??!! She's been to Canada's Wonderland once, and that was with me and my brother. We could drive for an hour to a restaurant, and we walk in and if the host says it's a 15-minute wait, my husband storms back to the car and starts the engine. We'd better be in the car with him or he's leaving us there. His idea of fun is sitting in a basement by himself playing with the levels on a song he's been recording for THREE YEARS. (It's good, Rob, it's good, just release the damn thing and stop going all Kevin Shields on it for god's sakes...) But make him stand in a line, or even in the vicinity of people, and he comes off as a claustrophobic with Tourettes.
So... see, you have to understand... I was going to Disney World with the Old Man from A Christmas Story. And when you spend the day with him, I'm afraid dreams just don't come true.
So, to lift my spirits after a very long, tiring day where I went on a total of two rides because there was no goddamn way he was waiting in line for... does that thing say three hours?! YOU HAVE GOT TO BE F&$@ING KIDDING ME... I'll relay some of the things we all had to listen to all day:
"Well, the one thing I've learned about Disney immediately is that dreams might not come true, but they DO come with a side of fries."
[After a kid sounds like he's coughed up a lung beside us]: "If the Bubonic Plague ever comes back, its origins will be HERE."
Me: I can't believe you haven't made some comment about how this is the perfect place for terrorists to hit.
Him: Nah. If terrorists bombed Disney World, by the looks of the people here, it wouldn't affect the U.S. economy one bit.
He constantly sang Elvis Costello's "This Is Hell" while we were standing in line for "It's a Small World."
Him: What the hell is this ride anyway?
Me: It's a bunch of little animatronic dolls singing "It's a Small World After All." I saw it when I was 7 and thought it was amazing. I went back on it when I was 15 and thought it was crap. But I think the kids will like it.
Him: Oh my GOD why are we lining up for this?!
Me: It's the inspiration for The Simpsons episode where Lisa drinks the water and goes nuts. You know, "I AM THE LIZARD QUEEN!!"
Him: Really? Well, in that case, let's go line up. I want to see this.
Standing in line: "This is hell... this is hell..."
Me: You can say what you want about this place, but it's in impeccable shape. Look at the castle. That thing's got to be like 50 years old or older... and it looks brand new.
Him: Are you kidding? It's got NETTING holding it together, just look at those spires! That thing is coming down.
Me: [sigh] Those are CHRISTMAS LIGHTS. They are nets of Christmas lights.
Him: Oh.
"Can you tell me why so many middle-aged women are wearing mouse-ear hats? Where the hell else are they going to wear the damn things after they leave this park?" [I must admit, I'd been thinking the same thing.]
Him: What in GOD'S NAME is that person eating over there?!
Me: That's a turkey leg! Can you believe it?? That's what I was telling you about two years ago when Sue and I went to Universal Studios. They sell them in little carts with popcorn and stuff. Isn't it disgusting?
Him: Good Christ, I bet it's got more bacteria on it than the street does right now.
Him: Did we park in the Heroes or Villains lot?
Me: We were in Peter Pan.
Him: That doesn't answer my question!
Me: I'm sorry, do you remember Peter Pan hunting down Captain Hook to kill him? What do YOU think he was??
Him: Oh, who the hell watches these stupid movies.
There were so many more, but I'd tuned him out after a while. My daughter and I broke away at one point to go to Ariel's Grotto (insert hubby's Hugh Hefner joke here) and had a lovely time waiting in line for 85 minutes, laughing and looking at the things on the walls on the way in. For that brief moment, we had a blast. And then it was back to Crank Central again. We found him standing outside the Winnie the Pooh ride, complaining that it was the worst 3 minutes of his life while my son sat next to him happily eating a "grossly overpriced" ice cream cone.
So... I want to come back some time. If any of you are Disney fans, let me know and I'll go with you instead. Tomorrow: my husband will ruin Animal Kingdom.
That is... everyone but Sir Grumpy McCrank. Also known as, MY HUSBAND.
Ah yes, see, everyone's been saying for weeks now, "Have fun! You'll have a great time!" And I smile and say, "Oh yes... I'm sure we, um, will..." but they don't realize that I tend to go to theme parks with my brother, or friends, or anyone but my husband because he hates this sort of thing. My daughter is 8, and he has never taken her to see fireworks, because he hates the crowds and the noise and fireworks are stupid and do you know how long it will take to get out of the parking lot??!! She's been to Canada's Wonderland once, and that was with me and my brother. We could drive for an hour to a restaurant, and we walk in and if the host says it's a 15-minute wait, my husband storms back to the car and starts the engine. We'd better be in the car with him or he's leaving us there. His idea of fun is sitting in a basement by himself playing with the levels on a song he's been recording for THREE YEARS. (It's good, Rob, it's good, just release the damn thing and stop going all Kevin Shields on it for god's sakes...) But make him stand in a line, or even in the vicinity of people, and he comes off as a claustrophobic with Tourettes.
So... see, you have to understand... I was going to Disney World with the Old Man from A Christmas Story. And when you spend the day with him, I'm afraid dreams just don't come true.
So, to lift my spirits after a very long, tiring day where I went on a total of two rides because there was no goddamn way he was waiting in line for... does that thing say three hours?! YOU HAVE GOT TO BE F&$@ING KIDDING ME... I'll relay some of the things we all had to listen to all day:
"Well, the one thing I've learned about Disney immediately is that dreams might not come true, but they DO come with a side of fries."
[After a kid sounds like he's coughed up a lung beside us]: "If the Bubonic Plague ever comes back, its origins will be HERE."
Me: I can't believe you haven't made some comment about how this is the perfect place for terrorists to hit.
Him: Nah. If terrorists bombed Disney World, by the looks of the people here, it wouldn't affect the U.S. economy one bit.
He constantly sang Elvis Costello's "This Is Hell" while we were standing in line for "It's a Small World."
Him: What the hell is this ride anyway?
Me: It's a bunch of little animatronic dolls singing "It's a Small World After All." I saw it when I was 7 and thought it was amazing. I went back on it when I was 15 and thought it was crap. But I think the kids will like it.
Him: Oh my GOD why are we lining up for this?!
Me: It's the inspiration for The Simpsons episode where Lisa drinks the water and goes nuts. You know, "I AM THE LIZARD QUEEN!!"
Him: Really? Well, in that case, let's go line up. I want to see this.
Standing in line: "This is hell... this is hell..."
Me: You can say what you want about this place, but it's in impeccable shape. Look at the castle. That thing's got to be like 50 years old or older... and it looks brand new.
Him: Are you kidding? It's got NETTING holding it together, just look at those spires! That thing is coming down.
Me: [sigh] Those are CHRISTMAS LIGHTS. They are nets of Christmas lights.
Him: Oh.
"Can you tell me why so many middle-aged women are wearing mouse-ear hats? Where the hell else are they going to wear the damn things after they leave this park?" [I must admit, I'd been thinking the same thing.]
Him: What in GOD'S NAME is that person eating over there?!
Me: That's a turkey leg! Can you believe it?? That's what I was telling you about two years ago when Sue and I went to Universal Studios. They sell them in little carts with popcorn and stuff. Isn't it disgusting?
Him: Good Christ, I bet it's got more bacteria on it than the street does right now.
Him: Did we park in the Heroes or Villains lot?
Me: We were in Peter Pan.
Him: That doesn't answer my question!
Me: I'm sorry, do you remember Peter Pan hunting down Captain Hook to kill him? What do YOU think he was??
Him: Oh, who the hell watches these stupid movies.
There were so many more, but I'd tuned him out after a while. My daughter and I broke away at one point to go to Ariel's Grotto (insert hubby's Hugh Hefner joke here) and had a lovely time waiting in line for 85 minutes, laughing and looking at the things on the walls on the way in. For that brief moment, we had a blast. And then it was back to Crank Central again. We found him standing outside the Winnie the Pooh ride, complaining that it was the worst 3 minutes of his life while my son sat next to him happily eating a "grossly overpriced" ice cream cone.
So... I want to come back some time. If any of you are Disney fans, let me know and I'll go with you instead. Tomorrow: my husband will ruin Animal Kingdom.
Wednesday, January 02, 2013
How to Make a Mom's Day...
Happy new year, everyone!
So, we're in Florida for a whirlwind Disney trip with the kids. Not staying AT Disney (long story as to why) but we'll be there for a couple of days.
My kids are 8 and 5. They're at that age where they go from having fun together (which is typically loud and goofy) to pulling hair and hitting in a split-second. I think they're great kids — they're polite, they're smart, and yes, they can be loud, but it's usually in a good, spirited way, and rarely in a bad, angry way (when they are the latter, they get pulled aside and spoken to).
Before I had kids, like pretty much every childless person on the planet, I would see "spirited" kids in the grocery stores or restaurants pulling hair and being loud and disruptive, laughing and cackling together, and it would be distracting and at some point, inevitably, my husband would look at me and say, "My kids will never act like that." We've all done it, said it, thought it. And then — you know the story — you HAVE kids and realize wow, no matter what I do, they'll pretty much act like that, and when you see other kids acting like that in grocery stores and restaurants, you simply tune them out. They don't bother me, and you watch the poor harried parents shushing them and trying their best to keep them under control, and your heart goes out to them. For, it's likely that before you had kids, the parents of the kids you were shaking your head at in public were ALSO shushing and trying to keep those kids under control, but you simply didn't notice and tsk-tsked their lack of parental control.
Now I'm the mom trying to keep them under control, seeing the sympathetic looks on the faces of other parents, or the disapproval on the faces of those with no kids (or who have kids and have tricked themselves into thinking their children are perfect). I'm trying to load groceries onto the conveyer belt, and my kids are giggling and trying to tickle each other, or ducking around the grocery cart to see if they can tag the other kid. Just having fun, not fighting... but just awful to the many people who think kids should be seen and not heard. (I don't mean to say they're like this all the time, but when they are, it sometimes seems like it.)
So. Today. We drove last night to Detroit because we were flying out from there this morning. The kids didn't get anything to eat until about 7:30 at night because we were later than we expected packing everything, and crossing the border, and they were pretty punchy by the time we got to the restaurant. They sat kicking each other under the table, giggling and laughing loudly, and then we got them to the hotel and they jumped on the beds and ran around the room and we shushed them and told them to sit on the beds because people underneath could hear them running. This morning, up at 5 a.m., shushing them and telling them they couldn't wake other people in the hotel. They quietly came down to the lobby, my husband ran out to get the car, and I ran them over to the continental breakfast buffet, stuffing a bagel in each of their pockets and giving them little bowls of Fruit Loops. At the airport, they stood quietly in line, but every time one would look at the other and start giggling, we'd become uber-aware of the looks we were getting from people because our children were loud.
On the plane, my husband always books three seats together, and one on its own, and then acts surprised when we get there (I'm onto you, dude...). And so, I was with them. They were fine when I was between them, but near the end of the 2.5-hour flight, they were sitting together while my daughter played her DS and my son watched her (he loves watching people play games) and then they began giggling and wrestling and squirming and were definitely starting to get a little crazy, and I'm leaning over and telling them over and over to PLEASE BE QUIET. (Of course, babies were screaming two rows back, and the girl in the seat in front of us didn't stop yelling the entire flight.) Then into the airport, where they chased each other up the ramps... then to the car rental place, where they had put their backpacks on their fronts and were ramming into each other with their "big bellies" (it seems funny to me now, but at the time I saw other kids quietly sitting on a bench and so I was mortified). In the car they moved from giggling to smacking each other, then at the restaurant for lunch my son laid down on the bench and said he wanted to sleep, so I kept dragging him to a sitting position and got him to eat, and then in the car back to smacking before my son quieted down, complained he was "super tired" and fell asleep. At the hotel they ran around in the room, we shushed them (natch), then they tore down the hall to the elevator to go to the pool. They swam for over 2 hours, and then walked back to the room, got changed, and we went out to an Italian restaurant that had good reviews.
We walked in, and it was really nice decor, tiny, and quiet. All senior citizens or couples (they'd said on the site it was a family restaurant). We sat down, kids across from each other, and my daughter quietly started colouring on a piece of paper, while my son just sat there quietly for a bit, then asked if he could play a game on my phone. Food came, they both ate wonderfully, quietly, my husband and I had a conversation about Boardwalk Empire, and then my daughter went back to colouring while my son talked to me for a bit afterwards. Halfway through the meal, I thought to myself, I know these kids are completely knackered, but I wonder if the other people in the restaurant are thinking these are the most wonderfully behaved children they've ever seen?
And then, just as we were finishing up, a couple who'd been eating in the corner stood up and were about to leave when the woman came over to our table and said, "I don't mean to interrupt, but I wanted to tell you that your children are absolutely lovely and SO well behaved! Their teachers must LOVE them!" My daughter looked up from her colouring and said yes, her teacher loved her (ha!) and my son was too tired to even respond. I thanked her profusely, beaming with pride, and she said it was a joy to be in a restaurant with such quiet kids.
And my day was made.
The next time I see a couple with quiet kids, I'm going to tell them that. Because, there's a 99% chance those kids aren't always that quiet, but they're just having a good night. And those parents have shushed and begged and gotten the dirty looks all the time from other people, and are sighing with internal relief that their kids are giving them a quiet night, for whatever reason. And rather than the angry looks, to get someone to tell them their kids are great? An AMAZING feeling.
Just for that, I'm going to let my kids tear Disney apart over the next two days. ;)
Have a happy New Year, everyone!
So, we're in Florida for a whirlwind Disney trip with the kids. Not staying AT Disney (long story as to why) but we'll be there for a couple of days.
My kids are 8 and 5. They're at that age where they go from having fun together (which is typically loud and goofy) to pulling hair and hitting in a split-second. I think they're great kids — they're polite, they're smart, and yes, they can be loud, but it's usually in a good, spirited way, and rarely in a bad, angry way (when they are the latter, they get pulled aside and spoken to).
Before I had kids, like pretty much every childless person on the planet, I would see "spirited" kids in the grocery stores or restaurants pulling hair and being loud and disruptive, laughing and cackling together, and it would be distracting and at some point, inevitably, my husband would look at me and say, "My kids will never act like that." We've all done it, said it, thought it. And then — you know the story — you HAVE kids and realize wow, no matter what I do, they'll pretty much act like that, and when you see other kids acting like that in grocery stores and restaurants, you simply tune them out. They don't bother me, and you watch the poor harried parents shushing them and trying their best to keep them under control, and your heart goes out to them. For, it's likely that before you had kids, the parents of the kids you were shaking your head at in public were ALSO shushing and trying to keep those kids under control, but you simply didn't notice and tsk-tsked their lack of parental control.
Now I'm the mom trying to keep them under control, seeing the sympathetic looks on the faces of other parents, or the disapproval on the faces of those with no kids (or who have kids and have tricked themselves into thinking their children are perfect). I'm trying to load groceries onto the conveyer belt, and my kids are giggling and trying to tickle each other, or ducking around the grocery cart to see if they can tag the other kid. Just having fun, not fighting... but just awful to the many people who think kids should be seen and not heard. (I don't mean to say they're like this all the time, but when they are, it sometimes seems like it.)
So. Today. We drove last night to Detroit because we were flying out from there this morning. The kids didn't get anything to eat until about 7:30 at night because we were later than we expected packing everything, and crossing the border, and they were pretty punchy by the time we got to the restaurant. They sat kicking each other under the table, giggling and laughing loudly, and then we got them to the hotel and they jumped on the beds and ran around the room and we shushed them and told them to sit on the beds because people underneath could hear them running. This morning, up at 5 a.m., shushing them and telling them they couldn't wake other people in the hotel. They quietly came down to the lobby, my husband ran out to get the car, and I ran them over to the continental breakfast buffet, stuffing a bagel in each of their pockets and giving them little bowls of Fruit Loops. At the airport, they stood quietly in line, but every time one would look at the other and start giggling, we'd become uber-aware of the looks we were getting from people because our children were loud.
On the plane, my husband always books three seats together, and one on its own, and then acts surprised when we get there (I'm onto you, dude...). And so, I was with them. They were fine when I was between them, but near the end of the 2.5-hour flight, they were sitting together while my daughter played her DS and my son watched her (he loves watching people play games) and then they began giggling and wrestling and squirming and were definitely starting to get a little crazy, and I'm leaning over and telling them over and over to PLEASE BE QUIET. (Of course, babies were screaming two rows back, and the girl in the seat in front of us didn't stop yelling the entire flight.) Then into the airport, where they chased each other up the ramps... then to the car rental place, where they had put their backpacks on their fronts and were ramming into each other with their "big bellies" (it seems funny to me now, but at the time I saw other kids quietly sitting on a bench and so I was mortified). In the car they moved from giggling to smacking each other, then at the restaurant for lunch my son laid down on the bench and said he wanted to sleep, so I kept dragging him to a sitting position and got him to eat, and then in the car back to smacking before my son quieted down, complained he was "super tired" and fell asleep. At the hotel they ran around in the room, we shushed them (natch), then they tore down the hall to the elevator to go to the pool. They swam for over 2 hours, and then walked back to the room, got changed, and we went out to an Italian restaurant that had good reviews.
We walked in, and it was really nice decor, tiny, and quiet. All senior citizens or couples (they'd said on the site it was a family restaurant). We sat down, kids across from each other, and my daughter quietly started colouring on a piece of paper, while my son just sat there quietly for a bit, then asked if he could play a game on my phone. Food came, they both ate wonderfully, quietly, my husband and I had a conversation about Boardwalk Empire, and then my daughter went back to colouring while my son talked to me for a bit afterwards. Halfway through the meal, I thought to myself, I know these kids are completely knackered, but I wonder if the other people in the restaurant are thinking these are the most wonderfully behaved children they've ever seen?
And then, just as we were finishing up, a couple who'd been eating in the corner stood up and were about to leave when the woman came over to our table and said, "I don't mean to interrupt, but I wanted to tell you that your children are absolutely lovely and SO well behaved! Their teachers must LOVE them!" My daughter looked up from her colouring and said yes, her teacher loved her (ha!) and my son was too tired to even respond. I thanked her profusely, beaming with pride, and she said it was a joy to be in a restaurant with such quiet kids.
And my day was made.
The next time I see a couple with quiet kids, I'm going to tell them that. Because, there's a 99% chance those kids aren't always that quiet, but they're just having a good night. And those parents have shushed and begged and gotten the dirty looks all the time from other people, and are sighing with internal relief that their kids are giving them a quiet night, for whatever reason. And rather than the angry looks, to get someone to tell them their kids are great? An AMAZING feeling.
Just for that, I'm going to let my kids tear Disney apart over the next two days. ;)
Have a happy New Year, everyone!
Sunday, December 30, 2012
This Is... Finding Lost!
I went to see This Is 40 today and for Lost fans, as I just mentioned excitedly on my Facebook page, there's a very funny onrunning joke about the teenage daughter getting caught up on six seasons of Lost in five weeks (and the mental breakdown she almost has when her iPad is taken away from her). During one scene, everyone's in the teenage girl's room and dancing around, and you can see her bookshelf. I immediately spotted a Lost book that I knew, and my husband saw it at the same time and leaned over and joked that my books should have been there, too, "... and then maybe the teenager wouldn't be so confused about the show."
Ha!
When I posted on Facebook that I'd seen this book, a friend of mine posted a screencap to show everyone. And that's when I saw that my book WAS there!! The season 4 book, in fact! (See below; season 5 is there, too!)
Ah. My little season 4 book got its cameo in a Judd Apatow film! Does that mean I'm only one degree of separation from Paul Rudd? (Please say yes.)
UPDATE: David Lavery just posted something about how his book was in this picture (his was the one that I saw in the theatre because it's in the very front) and I realized in his bigger version of the photo that my season 5 book is there, too! It's sitting two away from the Lost Encyclopedia, which is right in the back. ;)
Ha!
When I posted on Facebook that I'd seen this book, a friend of mine posted a screencap to show everyone. And that's when I saw that my book WAS there!! The season 4 book, in fact! (See below; season 5 is there, too!)
![]() |
| I have put a black arrow to point out the spine of my book, because Paintbrush won't change my paint colour to white to make it more obvious! |
UPDATE: David Lavery just posted something about how his book was in this picture (his was the one that I saw in the theatre because it's in the very front) and I realized in his bigger version of the photo that my season 5 book is there, too! It's sitting two away from the Lost Encyclopedia, which is right in the back. ;)
Friday, December 21, 2012
More Last-Minute Christmas Gift Ideas!
OK, so the world hasn't yet come to an end (and here I went and spent my life savings this week... NOW WHAT?!) so I can continue with some more book ideas. Of course, more books that I worked on this year and think are amazing and fabulous and that you should own. On Tuesday I listed all of the fiction books I've worked on this year. Now I'll move on to the non-fiction.
I already mentioned Who Is the Doctor, which came out in April, and I mention it again because it's an amazing book you should own.
Next up, Richard Crouse is the film critic for Canada AM, and I've been his editor for many years. About a year and a half ago he came to me with some ideas for his next book, and the moment he began talking about what he called "the most banned film of all time," all his other ideas just went out the window for me. The resulting book — Raising Hell: Ken Russell and The Unmaking of The Devils — is a fascinating and shocking account of the making of this film, which starred Oliver Reed and Vanessa Redgrave, why it was so controversial and hated at the time, and how it's undergone a renaissance 40 years later, where critics are now hailing it as a masterpiece. (Such is hindsight...) In the summer, anyone who follows me on Facebook probably saw me posting things like, "OMG I just got an email from Terry Gilliam!" or "Guillermo del Toro just totally emailed me, so..." as I became more smug about it. And that's because of the back cover endorsements we were collecting for the book. See them for yourself here (click to enlarge):
And then go buy this book for yourself (here in Canada, here in the U.S.). It's an amazing account of filmmaking in the early '70s and how censorship rulings can entirely change the fate of one film. And it'll make you reflect on whether or not we've actually changed much as a society since then.
This next book is another fantastic book I've had the pleasure of working on. My First Guitar is a decade-long labour of love by NY-based guitarist Julia Crowe. Crowe, a columnist for Classical Guitar magazine, began collecting stories of famous guitarists talking about their very first guitar when she discovered that the simple plea, "Tell me about your first guitar," unleashed stories not just about the guitar but guitar lessons, parents encouraging/discouraging the playing, losing the first guitar, second and subsequent guitars, recordings and bands, and pretty much everything else. So she began asking that question, and the answers were revelatory. And when Mr. Jimmy Page not only agreed to the interview but took her to his mansion outside of London to show her some of his guitars, suddenly many other musicians began stepping up to talk to this diminutive powerhouse of a writer. The resulting book is extraordinary, and although I'm not a guitarist (my husband is the guitarist in our family), I am a pianist, and if you ever had a first instrument that you loved so much, or had a true passion for something at a young age, you will identify with the stories in this book. It features stories from guitarists as diverse as Joey Santiago from The Pixies or Lee Ranaldo from Sonic Youth; Melissa Etheridge; Joe Satriani; Alex Lifeson from Rush; the late Les Paul, in one of his final interviews; Roger McGuinn; Peter Frampton; Michael McKean and Christopher Guest; and many, many more. From blues to jazz to classical, alternative and hard rock, she covers the gamut of musicians in this tome. And throughout, she intersperses her own story of becoming a guitarist, which honestly is one of the highlights of the entire book. This is the book for every musician in your life. Get it here in the U.S. and here in Canada.
Next up is the other book you should buy for the musicians in your life. Know any Beach Boys fans? If you do, there's only one book they should own, and it's 50 Sides of the Beach Boys by Mark Dillon. Like Crowe's book, it features interviews from 50 people involved with or influenced by the Beach Boys in one way or the other. In a truly unique format, Dillon chose the 50 songs he believed were the defining moments of the Beach Boys oeuvre, and then found 50 people to talk about the importance of each of those tracks. Not only did he manage to get every living member of the Beach Boys to choose a track (including Mr. Brian Wilson) but he got Zooey Deschanel to talk about "Wouldn't It Be Nice"; Lyle Lovett on "God Only Knows"; Jace Lasek (from Besnard Lakes, one of my favourite singers!) on "Good Vibrations"; Cameron Crowe on "Feel Flows"; Matthew Sweet on "Wonderful"; Alice Cooper on "In My Room"; John Sebastian on "Surfer Girl"; and many more. Ordered chronologically, the explanations of the songs are interspersed with biographical material of the band, so you get both the story along with the 50 voices talking about how this monumental band became much more than a bunch of surfer dudes, writing some of the most incredible music of the 20th century. You can get it here in Canada and here in the U.S.
And just to show that not all of my non-fiction titles this year were music/TV/film oriented (and only now am I realizing that all of them — including the Doctor Who book — featured orange covers! What is THAT all about?!) my last offering is Moe & Me, a book by Globe and Mail golf writer Lorne Rubenstein. As many of you know, I'm married to the other prominent Canadian golf writer, so I've edited a lot of golf writing and know a hell of a lot about golf. (I always joke with my husband that I'm the president of KWOGA: Knowledgeable Wives Of Golfers Association.) But I'd never worked with Lorne until now, and the two of us hit it off pretty immediately. This is a labour of love he'd worked on for years about the 40 years in which he knew Moe Norman, one of the most fascinating and least-understood players in golf. Moe was either autistic, or suffered from Asperger's, or had been traumatized by a serious head wound he incurred when he was five and had a tobogganing accident. While no doctor can agree on what was wrong with him, what was undeniable was that he could point to a spot on the golf course, and hit the ball EXACTLY there. You tell him how high, he'd hit it that high. You say hit that telephone wire, he'll hit that telephone wire. So why wasn't he the greatest player on the PGA Tour? Because socially he couldn't look people in the eye, and he used double-speak — "OK, OK, where should I hit the ball, where should I hit the ball?" — and when he would hit the most incredible shot anyone had ever seen, the audience would laugh in shock and amazement. But Moe thought they were laughing at him (at his sweaters that he wore in July, or the loud brightly coloured striped pants that went with it) and it would throw off his mental game completely. He fell apart during games, but was so astounding at a driving range that the top players in the PGA would cease practice just to come and watch him hit balls. His story is a sad one, but he wouldn't have wanted anyone to think that: instead, Lorne remembers him as a funny, warm, and delightful person who, according to Tiger Woods, was one of only two people in the game of golf who truly owned his swing (Ben Hogan being the other). Moe Norman died eight years ago, but his memory lives on in this great book. Buy it for the sports fan in your family, here in Canada, and here in the U.S.
And that just about sums up the books I've been working on this year! I hope you enjoy reading some of them as much as I did editing them. :)
I already mentioned Who Is the Doctor, which came out in April, and I mention it again because it's an amazing book you should own.
Next up, Richard Crouse is the film critic for Canada AM, and I've been his editor for many years. About a year and a half ago he came to me with some ideas for his next book, and the moment he began talking about what he called "the most banned film of all time," all his other ideas just went out the window for me. The resulting book — Raising Hell: Ken Russell and The Unmaking of The Devils — is a fascinating and shocking account of the making of this film, which starred Oliver Reed and Vanessa Redgrave, why it was so controversial and hated at the time, and how it's undergone a renaissance 40 years later, where critics are now hailing it as a masterpiece. (Such is hindsight...) In the summer, anyone who follows me on Facebook probably saw me posting things like, "OMG I just got an email from Terry Gilliam!" or "Guillermo del Toro just totally emailed me, so..." as I became more smug about it. And that's because of the back cover endorsements we were collecting for the book. See them for yourself here (click to enlarge):
And then go buy this book for yourself (here in Canada, here in the U.S.). It's an amazing account of filmmaking in the early '70s and how censorship rulings can entirely change the fate of one film. And it'll make you reflect on whether or not we've actually changed much as a society since then.
This next book is another fantastic book I've had the pleasure of working on. My First Guitar is a decade-long labour of love by NY-based guitarist Julia Crowe. Crowe, a columnist for Classical Guitar magazine, began collecting stories of famous guitarists talking about their very first guitar when she discovered that the simple plea, "Tell me about your first guitar," unleashed stories not just about the guitar but guitar lessons, parents encouraging/discouraging the playing, losing the first guitar, second and subsequent guitars, recordings and bands, and pretty much everything else. So she began asking that question, and the answers were revelatory. And when Mr. Jimmy Page not only agreed to the interview but took her to his mansion outside of London to show her some of his guitars, suddenly many other musicians began stepping up to talk to this diminutive powerhouse of a writer. The resulting book is extraordinary, and although I'm not a guitarist (my husband is the guitarist in our family), I am a pianist, and if you ever had a first instrument that you loved so much, or had a true passion for something at a young age, you will identify with the stories in this book. It features stories from guitarists as diverse as Joey Santiago from The Pixies or Lee Ranaldo from Sonic Youth; Melissa Etheridge; Joe Satriani; Alex Lifeson from Rush; the late Les Paul, in one of his final interviews; Roger McGuinn; Peter Frampton; Michael McKean and Christopher Guest; and many, many more. From blues to jazz to classical, alternative and hard rock, she covers the gamut of musicians in this tome. And throughout, she intersperses her own story of becoming a guitarist, which honestly is one of the highlights of the entire book. This is the book for every musician in your life. Get it here in the U.S. and here in Canada.
Next up is the other book you should buy for the musicians in your life. Know any Beach Boys fans? If you do, there's only one book they should own, and it's 50 Sides of the Beach Boys by Mark Dillon. Like Crowe's book, it features interviews from 50 people involved with or influenced by the Beach Boys in one way or the other. In a truly unique format, Dillon chose the 50 songs he believed were the defining moments of the Beach Boys oeuvre, and then found 50 people to talk about the importance of each of those tracks. Not only did he manage to get every living member of the Beach Boys to choose a track (including Mr. Brian Wilson) but he got Zooey Deschanel to talk about "Wouldn't It Be Nice"; Lyle Lovett on "God Only Knows"; Jace Lasek (from Besnard Lakes, one of my favourite singers!) on "Good Vibrations"; Cameron Crowe on "Feel Flows"; Matthew Sweet on "Wonderful"; Alice Cooper on "In My Room"; John Sebastian on "Surfer Girl"; and many more. Ordered chronologically, the explanations of the songs are interspersed with biographical material of the band, so you get both the story along with the 50 voices talking about how this monumental band became much more than a bunch of surfer dudes, writing some of the most incredible music of the 20th century. You can get it here in Canada and here in the U.S.
And just to show that not all of my non-fiction titles this year were music/TV/film oriented (and only now am I realizing that all of them — including the Doctor Who book — featured orange covers! What is THAT all about?!) my last offering is Moe & Me, a book by Globe and Mail golf writer Lorne Rubenstein. As many of you know, I'm married to the other prominent Canadian golf writer, so I've edited a lot of golf writing and know a hell of a lot about golf. (I always joke with my husband that I'm the president of KWOGA: Knowledgeable Wives Of Golfers Association.) But I'd never worked with Lorne until now, and the two of us hit it off pretty immediately. This is a labour of love he'd worked on for years about the 40 years in which he knew Moe Norman, one of the most fascinating and least-understood players in golf. Moe was either autistic, or suffered from Asperger's, or had been traumatized by a serious head wound he incurred when he was five and had a tobogganing accident. While no doctor can agree on what was wrong with him, what was undeniable was that he could point to a spot on the golf course, and hit the ball EXACTLY there. You tell him how high, he'd hit it that high. You say hit that telephone wire, he'll hit that telephone wire. So why wasn't he the greatest player on the PGA Tour? Because socially he couldn't look people in the eye, and he used double-speak — "OK, OK, where should I hit the ball, where should I hit the ball?" — and when he would hit the most incredible shot anyone had ever seen, the audience would laugh in shock and amazement. But Moe thought they were laughing at him (at his sweaters that he wore in July, or the loud brightly coloured striped pants that went with it) and it would throw off his mental game completely. He fell apart during games, but was so astounding at a driving range that the top players in the PGA would cease practice just to come and watch him hit balls. His story is a sad one, but he wouldn't have wanted anyone to think that: instead, Lorne remembers him as a funny, warm, and delightful person who, according to Tiger Woods, was one of only two people in the game of golf who truly owned his swing (Ben Hogan being the other). Moe Norman died eight years ago, but his memory lives on in this great book. Buy it for the sports fan in your family, here in Canada, and here in the U.S.
And that just about sums up the books I've been working on this year! I hope you enjoy reading some of them as much as I did editing them. :)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)





















