![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgj_Q1a29kY-54zj4luYFMXtJoZlQ3nY94Oy_UWRMhG-cR2QoDEkAhR8g_EYlz6OkmbbeGWB0WTMxoQingFDZR1tO3KaJM9864-iU5yf6bkFEupb912N9YELNstQowTyg3ZUxRU/s200/image_5280745.jpg)
So, as I've been reporting, I'm gunning through Friday Night Lights' first season on DVD, hoping to finish it before the season 2 premiere at the beginning of October. I've decided as of last night's episode that my new fave person on television is Liz Mikel, who plays Smash Williams' mother on the show. She is SO amazing, I'm on the edge of my seat whenever she's on screen. From the first time she burst into the house when Smash was doin' the nasty with one of his teammates' girlfriends on the couch and his mom walked that girl back outside and told her she works at Planned Parenthood and assumes this isn't the last she'll see of the girl, to when she storms into the coach's office after discovering something in her son's room (I'm trying to stay as vague as possible because I really want everyone to be watching this show and I don't want to spoil it) this woman is larger than life, confident, and will do ANYTHING to protect her children. Even if it means kicking them out of the house until they grow up enough to respect her and be allowed back in. She's amazing.
This made me laugh out loud. Of course, it is the UK Sun that is "reporting" it, so it could be complete fantasy (for someone who is as pop-culture savvy as Tarantino, I find it hard to believe he's never heard of Heroes), but it's still pretty funny.
K-Ville premiered last night, and I haven't had a chance to watch it yet, but the ratings were strong, according to Variety. However, as they report in the article, it'll be interesting to see what happens next week when it's up against Heroes and isn't the only new show on TV. It was pretty smart to jump the gun by a week, since EVERYTHING seems to be starting up again next week.
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjxi7bMhvx9W5eGSd0OmMtdOhd5mlORE8qhcjWNxaDIteUJrpldsopPo8vMIn3s99_yLMMt_XCjP4x4-pdMP4ZBmANOKiguXuj1_Ee7EnvKitXFFTbaZSTGTT9jMSy3swzVe44G/s200/stardustad-719341.jpg)
And finally, I know I've talked about this on here before, and I don't want to keep going on about it, but I really do believe there needs to be proper education out there on the subject. So to repeat what I've said before, breastfeeding is NOT wrong. Breastfeeding in public is NOT wrong. I think women can be -- and most ARE, despite what the detractors say -- discreet, and they cover up. But for those who for some ungodly reason are offended by it, just the suggestion that there might be a baby suckling at a breast completely hidden underneath a cloth wrap is enough to send those people into a tizzy.
The latest controversy involving breastfeeding has happened over on the social networking site, Facebook. According to the Toronto Star, when a woman posted a photo of herself breastfeeding, she discovered the photo had been deleted (her breasts were not even pictured, it was a photo of her sons with absolutely no skin from her breast present at all). She emailed them simply to ask why the photo had been taken down, and because she dared to do so, her account was shut down. She was sent an email saying the photo contained "obscene" content. I've seen photos on Facebook of 16-year-old kids completely hammered at a keg party licking the face of someone else, and that's appropriate because their nipples aren't hanging out (though everything else is), but a woman feeding her child is obscene. O...kay.
Now a Facebook group has popped up that is growing by 1,000 members a day, who are posting photos of themselves breastfeeding (and of all of them, I have yet to see one that was "obscene") and trying to change the rules on Facebook. I wish them all the best. I've said it before and I'll say it again -- you don't want to eat in a bathroom stall, and neither does a baby, so if you're sitting in a restaurant and you see a mother breastfeeding her child, just look away if it bothers you. You wouldn't be staring at her otherwise, so why stare at her because she's feeding a baby? Most woman will turn into a corner to latch the child on so their nipples don't offend anyone, but once that baby is on there, the nipple is hidden, and if you can see the rest of the breast minus the nipple, how is that any different than a woman wearing a low-cut top?
I saw a video of Bill Maher talking about breastfeeding that so enraged me, I won't even post it here because I don't want other people to watch this drivel. But in it, he said that women who breastfeed in public are "too lazy to either plan ahead or cover up." And I quote. Because as we all know, if only that woman had planned ahead and fed her child BEFORE going out, no child needs to be breastfed more than three times a day (all that stuff about every 90 minutes to 2 hours is utter bull, isn't it, Bill?). He then goes on to say that breastfeeders are narcissists who want the world to stare at them because they had gone and made a baby. And I'm sure everyone reading this would agree with me that whenever they've seen a woman breastfeeding in public, the woman first gets up on the restaurant table, screams for attention, pulls off her top and latches the kid on, leaving the other breast hanging out.
I would assume this man has never been married, and has certainly never had children. I love when people speak from experience. Every time I hear Bill Maher speak, I think he's an even slimier weasel than the time before.
When will people just leave breastfeeding women alone? Has it ever occurred to these naysayers that maybe breastfeeding ISN'T the narcissistic sport they've made it out to be? I remember agonizing over it with my first. I'd go out and always push my daughter beyond her limit, hoping I could get her home. And in the few times I did have to do it -- in a restaurant, mall, my office, etc. -- I did it as discreetly as possible, while covering up completely. I remember doing it in a mall once, and I had my daughter in a sling, went into one of those dark hallways that lead to the washrooms, stood facing a corner, got her latched on, and pulled the sling way up over her so no one could see anything, and then continued to walk around the mall. I saw a couple of people staring and realized that I hadn't pulled the sling all the way down, and about an inch of my tummy was showing. Yet girls were walking by me with most of their middle sections showing off their pierced navels, and no one was pointing. Because there was no suggestion that maybe, just maybe, they were doing something "obscene" with their breasts at that very moment.
What would you rather have in a restaurant: a woman breastfeeding her child in the booth next to you, or that same child screaming and howling like an alien because they are starving and their mother is too scared to breastfeed them for fear that asshats like Bill Maher just might be looking on?
5 comments:
here here! breastfeeding in public is NOT the evil, disgusting thing some people make it out to be!
I still cannot believe in this day and age of so called naturalism that people are so opposed to the natural art of breastfeeding.
As a nanny, plenty of my boss mamas breast fed in public and private. who cares? For the most part moms are discreet.
I agree-don't look if it bothers you. If that bothers a person , then how come the pre-teeny boppers wearing the belly rings and see through shorty shirts and the thong underwear showing under the WAY too short skirts don't get them all riled up?
keep up the fight Nik!
Kathy T
Claire Danes looked absolutely radiant in Stardust (rimshot!).
I wouldn't get attached to K-Ville. It probably will be canceled by this time next week. I didn't watch it either (because, like, its in the same timeslot as Heroes).
Hmmm. Ironic. I have friends who are members of groups about breast appreciation, and all you see in the groups are pictures of women's semi-exposed tatas. The minute there's a baby attached to them instead of a full-grown adult, it's obscene all of a sudden. Go figure.
These Dalek-bumps on the front of us? Made for food. They's to feed the babies, not titillate the adolescent boy-brains.
Going topless is legal in Ontario. I fail to see how attaching a baby to said breast makes it 'obscene'.
Yeah, I don't quite get it. I would say MOST women cover up...I did b/c I was not comfortable with any type of exposure of that kind. However, with my second I was much better at it, and probably did a little bit more in public (with a blanket). Once I HAD to in an airplane seat...cross country flight. I had a 7-week-old baby with me.
However, he was in a sling and slept wonderfully all the way there and back and hardly made more than a peep to eat once in awhile (he was in love with his sling). I don't think this one businessman next to me even knew I was breastfeeding at all.
Anyway, the point is, there is a way to be tactful and discreet about it. That's all I ask. Oh, and I'd love to see more of those 'lounge' type bathrooms like they have in department stores with a separate area that had couches and a coffeetable. I used to love nursing in there! Quiet and no woman would look at you weirdly. Plus, it was clean.
Post a Comment